π
June, 2025
π Website: https://www.sks.com.au
Here is a forensic financial analysis of SKS Technologies (ASX:SKS), based on its FY24 Annual Report, 1H25 Interim Results Presentation, and the May 2025 announcement of a $100 million data centre contract.
π Balance Sheet
| Risk Indicator | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill >25% of Assets | β | No indication of excessive goodwill; balance sheet primarily reflects tangible expansion |
| Rising Receivables Days | β | Working capital usage rose slightly due to growth, but receivables remained controlled and cash conversion was solid |
| Inventory Growth vs Profit | Not Applicable | Service-based business with limited inventory exposure |
| High Borrowings | β | No long-term debt; increased use of short-term facilities remains proportionate and manageable |
| Loans to Related Parties | β | No such transactions noted |
| Idle Cash | β | Cash used effectively for operations and M&A; no signs of hoarding |
π Income Statement
| Risk Indicator | Status | Comments |
| Revenue vs Profit Divergence | β | Revenue and EBITDA up YoY; NPAT impacted by project timing and cost adjustments but still positive |
| Capitalised R&D/Interest | β | No aggressive capitalisation observed |
| Extraordinary Items | β | Interim results reflect operational performance; no major one-offs identified |
| Tax Rate Drop | β | No abnormal tax reduction noted in interim figures |
| Profit vs Cash Flow | β | Operating cash flow strong despite modest NPAT, indicating earnings quality is sustained |
| One-Off Gains Boosting Profit | β | No signs of non-operating gains inflating interim profit |
ποΈ Governance, Disclosure & Audit
| Risk Indicator | Status | Comments |
| Auditor Changes | β | No recent changes; consistent auditor retained through interim period |
| Audit Qualifications | β | No qualifications noted in audit/review of interim financials |
| Exec Departures | β | Leadership remained stable through H1 FY25 |
| Transparency Issues | β | Continued clear disclosure of segment and performance data in interim release |
| Board Weakness | β | Board composition unchanged and retains relevant expertise |
| Executive Pay Misalignment | β | No material changes to pay noted during the interim period |
| Promotional Language | π | Some optimistic tone in outlook commentary, generally substantiated by ongoing growth |
π§ Strategic Risk Factors
| Risk Indicator | Status | Comments |
| Chronic Unprofitability | β | Company remains profitable at NPAT and EBITDA levels in 1H25 despite some margin compression |
| Revenue < Capex | β | Capex remains proportionate to revenue and growth plans |
| Funding Dependency | β | No new equity raised; facilities extended prudently to support scaling |
| Customer Concentration | π | Data centres still account for ~60% of secured work, reinforced by new $100M contract; strategic diversification continues |
| Pre-commercial Product Risk | β | All offerings are revenue-generating and commercially deployed |
| Short Cash Runway | β | Sufficient facilities and cash flow to support near-term needs; new contract to be funded from existing resources |
| Regulatory/Compliance Exposure | β | No compliance issues or regulatory red flags raised in interim period |
| Leadership Turnover During Expansion | β | Management remained stable through strategic execution |
β Final Summary
| Category | π΄ Red Flags | π Amber Flags |
| Balance Sheet | 0 | 0 |
| Income Statement | 0 | 0 |
| Governance / Disclosure | 0 | 1 |
| Strategic Risk Factors | 0 | 1 |
π΄ Total Red Flags: 0
π Total Amber Flags: 2
π Amber & π΄ Red Flag Overview
- π Promotional Language: Some sections of management commentary continue to use upbeat tone; performance mostly supports it.
- π Customer Concentration: Data centre segment remains dominant (~60% of work), now further entrenched by $100M Building C contract; diversification into defence, government and health continues.

Disclaimer: This information is provided purely for educational purposes. It takes no account of an individualβs personal financial circumstances and hence can in no way constitute financial advice. The above data may be subject to errors or inconsistencies for which the author takes no liability. It is imperative that all investors do their own research or if they need advice, seek it from a qualified financial adviser.
Forensic Analysis: SKS Technologies ASX:SKS
